Traditionally recessions are characterized by slowing economic growth, job loss, rising unemployment, and reduced consumer spending. As a worker, you may fear job loss. Or, as a business owner, lower consumer spending may worry you. As a manufacturer, slowing growth may derail your output. So sure, there are many things to worry about in a recession. But what about as an investor?
That answer is a little trickier.
Waiting to see if the economy hits a recession has become almost as popular as the anticipation of Y2K at the turn of the century. However, with Y2K, the outcome was…well…happily uneventful, with the most significant impact being pantries full of extra canned goods! So this year, will expectations of a 2023 recession fizzle out like Y2K, or will the forecasted 70% odds manifest into this feared economic event?1
Neither do we—nor does anyone else—know the answer. However, we don’t think what the powers-that-be call the economy is as important as what the current environment means for investors. Because regardless of if the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) assigns the "recession" moniker, investors still expect slowing GDP growth—whether it moves negative and remains there doesn’t change the fact that growth is slowing. And consumer confidence is down in the dumps—because even though wages have risen, inflation has stolen those higher paychecks and then some, so real wealth has fallen. Even CEOs feel the "blues" as corporate profits fall. Sounds rather depressing, right?
But here’s the optimism: The stock market is not the economy.
Before we explain how the stock market and economy differ—and, more importantly, why it matters to investors—we'd like to show what could be in store should a recession occur.
Historically the average recession has lasted 10 months, with negative GDP growth of 2.5% and a loss of 3.9 million jobs.2 Without a doubt, it’s a painful period. Fortunately, recessions have tended to be short-lived, while expansions have tended to be longer (69 months on average), created over 10 million jobs, and grew the economy by nearly 25%.3
But as we said, the economy and the stock market are not one and the same. So here's how they differ.
Many investors believe that the economy and the stock market are synonymous. And while they do interact, most of the time, they act differently. For example, let’s compare their makeup.
Services comprise 84% of U.S. employment and 59% of U.S. GDP but are only 38% of the share in the S&P 500.4 In other words, what drives the economy is not the same as what drives the stock market. Obviously, they overlap at some point, but they're not wholly congruent. This is most evident by the real returns of the stock market compared to GDP growth. (Note: When we talk about real, it means adjusted for inflation.)
The chart shows that the stock market typically has delivered more robust returns than GDP growth. In every decade except for two—the 1970s and the 2000s—real stock returns were significantly higher. The 2000s are interesting because the stock market faced two adverse events during that decade—the tech bubble bursting and the global financial crisis. Yet despite those significant events and resultant recessions, the decade was only down 1% and was followed by robust returns in the 2010s.
The other way that the stock market and economy differ is timing. The stock market tends to be a leading indicator of the economy. This means the stock market tends to fall—or rise—before seeing a similar economic trend. Or said another way, the stock market looks ahead while most reported economic data look behind.
Fearing a recession is natural. As workers or business owners, you can't help but worry. But as investors, a recession tends to mark a turning point. How so?
The announcement of a recession trails what’s already been happening in the economy. In other words, sentiment, business conditions, GDP growth, hiring, and other indicators have already fallen or turned negative. So when the NBER calls the recession, it's typically already reflected in stocks.
This chart shows historical stock market performance before, during, and after a recession. The worst price performance has been the year before a recession, with an average return of -3%. During a recession, the market was also down 1% on average. But after a downturn, stocks historically tended to be positive. Case in point: Two years following a recession, price returns were positive 82% of the time.5
So when you consider all of this, yes, a recession is a concern. But by the time of an official announcement, the market likely already should reflect much of the bad news. History shows that this has been true and goes even further. It also tends to signal that the market should be nearing bottom or should already have made the turn-up—a seemingly positive sign. So weirdly, investors should feel relief when the NBER declares “recession” because they’ve already been feeling the pain, and an upturn may be coming shortly.