‹ View All Insights

Is a Roth Conversion For You?

Published by Motley Fool Wealth Management on Wed, Nov 10, 2021
Is a Roth conversion for you?

"I want to avoid paying taxes, so I'm going to move all my IRA money into a Roth IRA.” Does this sound familiar?

We’ve heard this from many clients over the years. And for some, this may make perfect sense. But for others, it may not. The crux of the issue is tax optimization: Which is better—small tax payments over time (via traditional periodic distributions) or one large tax payment immediately (Roth conversion)?

What’s the breakeven?

Taxpayers can convert a traditional IRA into a Roth, even if they’ve started taking their required minimum distributions (RMDs). However, a taxpayer cannot switch just the annual RMD into a Roth. 

One way to assess whether a Roth or traditional IRA could be best suited for an individual’s situation is to look at a break-even analysis, which examines the point at which profit and loss are equal. 

Consider the following hypothetical example:

David and Janice, both in their mid-70s, were contemplating moving their traditional IRA assets into a Roth. The reason was simple: Their RMDs from a traditional IRA exceed their living expenses. In addition, by having a higher income, they may be subjected to increased Medicare premiums or a higher hurdle for deducting medical expenses on their tax returns. But by moving their assets to a Roth, they would not be required to take—or pay taxes on—distributions they did not need.

In this scenario, a Fool Wealth planner can assist with performing a breakeven analysis. Notably, this example assumes that leaving a legacy was not a priority for the clients. The results from this analysis are as follows:

email-chart-roth_breakevenThe analysis shows that David and Janice's breakeven for a Roth conversion would be 14 years. So each would be well into their 80s before the switch made tax sense.

Roth or traditional? How about both

Interestingly, many taxpayers think of this decision as an all-or-nothing shift. However, for some, the optimal solution may be a mix of both. That way, individuals could take deductions at the highest tax bracket while working and recognize income in the lowest tax bracket in retirement. This tax-arbitrage strategy is lost if 100% of assets are in only one approach. 

The chart below may help distinguish between the choices depending on an individual’s life stage. 

email-chart-ira_roth_lifestageA muddy decision

While converting to a Roth appears to be the financial move du jour, the decision should be highly individualized based on income level and resultant tax status. For some, the choice is straightforward: Roths make sense earlier in careers while traditional IRAs are better-suited for the late-career stage and into retirement. 

But for many individuals in between, there’s no one “right” solution. That's why it's essential to look at it from all angles and perform a breakeven analysis. This is especially critical if there’s a desire to leave a legacy, concerns about estate taxes, or other factors that may muddy the decision. 

Fortunately, a financial planner can consider the situation from a holistic wealth plan perspective and make an informed recommendation. Because at the end of the day, a Roth vs. traditional IRA is just one spoke on the wealth planning wheel.


The content in this article is provided for informational purposes only, reflects our general views on investing, and should not be relied upon as recommendations or financial planning advice. We encourage you to seek personalized advice from qualified professionals regarding all personal finance issues.

Access to Motley Fool Wealth Management (“MFWM”) is only available to clients pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement and acceptance of MFWM's Client Relationship Summary (PDF) and Brochure (PDF - 204 KB). You are encouraged to read these documents carefully. All investments involve risk and may lose money. MFWM does not guarantee the results of any of its advice or account management. Clients should be aware that their individual account results may not exactly match the performance of any of our Model Portfolios. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Each Personal Portfolio is subject to an account minimum, which varies based on the strategies included in the portfolio. MFWM retains the right to revise or modify portfolios and strategies if it believes such modifications would be in the best interests of its clients.

During discussions with our Wealth Advisors, they may provide advice with respect to 401(k) rollovers into accounts that are managed by MFWM. Such recommendations pose potential conflicts of interest in that rolling retirement savings into a MFWM managed account will generate ongoing asset-based fees for MFWM that it would not otherwise receive.

While we can counsel on tax efficiency and general tax considerations, MFWM does not (and is not permitted to) provide tax or legal advice. Clients who need such advice should consult tax and legal professionals. These comments may not be relied upon as personalized financial planning or tax advice.

MFMW, an affiliate of The Motley Fool LLC (“TMF”), is a separate legal entity, and all financial planning advice and discretionary asset management services for our clients are made independently by the financial planners and asset managers at MFWM. Neither of TMF co-founders, Tom Gardner and David Gardner, nor any other TMF analyst is involved in the investment decision-making or daily operations of MFWM. MFWM does not attempt to track any TMF services.